01
Crisis leadership · Sandoz
Defending a biosimilar under safety scrutiny
Challenge
Negative coverage in the medical press questioned the safety of a multiple sclerosis biosimilar. Left unanswered, the claims risked prescriber confidence, regulatory follow-up questions, analyst concern and a share-price reaction for a newly listed company.
Approach & solution
I designed and ran a three-tier response. Tier one contained the issue in the originating market with rapid, factual local rebuttal. Tier two validated the science externally, mobilising key opinion leaders and regulatory data to reinforce the biosimilarity evidence with journals and specialist media. Tier three aligned the organisation internally up to Board level, with a single approved position, briefed spokespeople and a clear escalation path. Medical, regulatory, legal, investor relations and commercial worked from one playbook and one message house.
Results
100% pull-through of the Sandoz position across top-tier outlets, including the BMJ. No analyst commentary and no share-price impact. The response model became the reference template for subsequent product issues.
Conclusion
The project demonstrates the discipline that separates crisis management from crisis reaction: containment, scientific validation and Board-level alignment executed simultaneously rather than sequentially.